Comments on: Where Next for VMware Workstation? http://vinf.net/2010/04/28/where-next-for-vmware-workstation/ My ramblings on the stuff that holds it all together Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:29:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Top Virtualization Blog Voting Time « Virtualization, Windows, Infrastructure and all that stuff in-between http://vinf.net/2010/04/28/where-next-for-vmware-workstation/#comment-2121 Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:16:23 +0000 https://vinf.wordpress.com/2010/04/28/where-next-for-vmware-workstation/#comment-2121 [...] http://vinf.net/2010/04/28/where-next-for-vmware-workstation/ [...]

]]> By: jason joel http://vinf.net/2010/04/28/where-next-for-vmware-workstation/#comment-1770 Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:56:12 +0000 https://vinf.wordpress.com/2010/04/28/where-next-for-vmware-workstation/#comment-1770 Thanks for sharing your ideas for future VMware Workstation features. We really value active involvement of our users in the definition of the product roadmap.

Jason Joel
Sr. Product Manager – VMware Workstation

]]> By: Vladan http://vinf.net/2010/04/28/where-next-for-vmware-workstation/#comment-1768 Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:03:52 +0000 https://vinf.wordpress.com/2010/04/28/where-next-for-vmware-workstation/#comment-1768 After the possibility to run natively ESX4 in Workstation it would be nice having the possibility to run 64bit nested VMs…. -:).

Already running a virtual cluster with nested VMs, but only 32bit VMs are supported. Good for learning vMotion, HA and FT already, but no Exchange 2007 or so…

Thanks
Vladan

]]> By: Tom Howarth http://vinf.net/2010/04/28/where-next-for-vmware-workstation/#comment-1767 Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:39:24 +0000 https://vinf.wordpress.com/2010/04/28/where-next-for-vmware-workstation/#comment-1767 very interesting proporsition, this is especially telling with IBM buying up Transitive and promptly killing their Sparc product

]]>